2. Where is the direct object? Before the verb Have, there is an agreement. “Les” is for “fries,” which is the female plural. Great, I`ve already learned, like U. I`m from the South. And I want to learn French before I die. The U demostrated der leson on relative is terribly interesting. Thanx a lot of men. Nazar. Concordance with the verbs of perception is even more difficult. They only require agreement if the subject of infinitive precedes the verb of perception. The verbs which, as a verb helping in the times and the composite moods, require the question of a “tre” require, in all these conjugations, consistency with the subject. In the past, what is both sex and the number of what affects it, make sure that the past participates agrees! The agreement with the pronoun verbs is less simple.

In general, since pronoun verbs use “tre” as auxiliary verbs, they must be approved with the subject. 5) For semi-auxiliary verbs, there is no correspondence with the direct object, because the object always belongs to the infinitive, not the semi-auxiliary object. Learn more about conformity with the verbs of Being and the passive voice. The rule is that if the direct object is before the verb have, there is an agreement with that direct object. As with the verbs of Being, all conjugations of passive voices require a match with the subject. The rule is: if the direct object is written according to the verb “have”: no correspondence! So we write “eaten” (no s at the end) If the subject is the indirect object of the verb and not the direct object, there is no correspondence – read more. In reality, speakers do not tend to add agreements with having in daily speech. They probably only make these agreements by speaking carefully and thinking about the written language when they speak. So if they don`t read a script, people would generally say that the vast majority of French verbs use having as tools and don`t fit their subjects, as the verbs of “Tre” do. However, they require the agreement of any previous direct purpose. In these cases, the reflexive pronoun is not the direct object.

In the first sentence, the farts are prepared; In the second case, the thing that is broken is the leg. And in these cases, there is no agreement on the past. The verb chord can be divided into five categories. Note that none of the verbs in this category (except hatch > hatched) have old entries that end in a consonant. In other words, the “agreement” of these verbs essentially applies only to the language of writing. In French, the old participations in tensions and composite moods must sometimes correspond to another part of the sentence, either the subject or the direct object. It`s a lot like adjectives: If an agreement is needed, you have to add e for feminine themes/objects and s for the pluralist. A lot of people want to avoid the direct object agreement – what do you think? Read the article and chat on Facebook: But having verbs need approval in a very specific construction: the participatory past must agree with the direct object if the verb advances.