A marriage settlement agreement in Oklahoma is a preferred way to settle a divorce because it allows both spouses to have a say in the final outcome of the case. It also tends to take less time and be cheaper. 2 The woman could hardly provide such evidence because she could not establish the existence of part of the matrimonial patrimony or its value. An undisputed divorce in Oklahoma is a district court lawsuit in the county where the complaining spouse has lived for thirty (30) days. Each spouse must have lived at least six (6) months in the state of Oklahoma before bringing the divorce action. Also called without divorce, an uncontested divorce can be introduced because of incompatibility and requires both spouses to agree on all matters related to their divorce, such as. B the Department of Heritage, child support and child care. These and other relevant issues can be resolved in a marriage comparison contract. If you and your next ex agree and you know exactly what you want from the divorce, you can reach a fair agreement without going through mediation. We can help you design a transaction contract to submit it to the court. The husband and wife agree that no debt or shared liability can be incurred from the date of this agreement. The husband and wife agree that each person is individually responsible for all debts he or she acquires after the date of this agreement.

This agreement establishes the agreement and agreement between the husband and wife with respect to the payment of war goods and finances and replaces all the prior discussions between us. No amendments or amendments to this Agreement, nor a waiver of the rights of this Agreement, take effect unless it is signed in writing by the party that is debited. 11 A transaction agreement is not enforceable if the court confirms it. This is a binding precedent. Dickason v. Dickason, 1980 OK 24, 607 p.2d 674; Hickman v. Hickman, 1997 OK 49, 10, 937 S.2d 85, 88. The Court of Civil Appeal correctly applied Dickason in a case where the facts were almost identical to those of the bar.

Adams v. Adams, 2000 OK CIV APP 87, 11 P.3d 220. We agree with Adams both in his position and in his explanatory statement. However, some spouses feel that they have not received an adequate proportion of assets or the visitation agreement they want. Since a conjugal transaction agreement is not in dispute, it is important that you are satisfied with the final terms of the agreement. It may seem that the collection of money or artworks are worth going to court to make sure the items are distributed to you. However, the time, money and unpredictability of family judges are important reasons why creating a marital comparison contract on your sharing of assets and debts is important. 8 Divorce proceedings are of fair knowledge, and the court has the power to distribute the matrimonial estate.